Men Who Wear 100% Nylon Tricot (Largest Collection on the Internet): Why Do Some Men Wear Nylon Tricot -- Part Two

I suppose some of you think I'm doing too much thinking and not enough posting--and you're probably right. Considering this appears to be the only resource on the planet that combines men with wearing nylon tricot and does not specialize in women's underwear (which is no longer made of nylon tricot for the most part), does not specialize in lycra (which is a whole other animal), but does cover the wearing and ejaculating into it (as in having sex). I'm afraid you're going to have to take some words along with the pictures. Whether anyone reads them or not, I don't really know or care. I'm just putting it out there on the internet to document what was and maybe someday will be again.

Prior to 1939, this was the primary material for all men's underwear. Various attempts to "soften" it by calling it "combed cotton" or "Egyptian Cotton" or attempts at blending it with other materials did little to make this material softer. About all you could say about cotton is that it absorbed. That it does: sweat, piss, and semen. It gets wet, chafes, stays wet, and generally seems to be the last kind of fabric anyone would want on their most sensitive parts. After nylon made its more official return after WWII and to the general public, the general use seemed to be primarily by lingerie makers. These were primarily men marketing the fabric to women which they, in turn, were turned on by. The whole theme of "looking sexy for your man" involved wearing multiple layers of silky nylon tricot that slid over each other and ultimately leading down to a double layer of nylon tricot crotch covering their goal. The one variation occurred in 1948 when Adolph Kiefer actually used a lingerie designer and cutter to use nylon tricot to create the first nylon suit.

The whole design of a 100% cotton brief or boxer brief seemed to be utilitarian with little emphasis put on the sensual. The wide elastic waistband to offer "support", the fly opening, the wide leg bands, and scratchy material all would indicate these garments were meant to be worn only for "practical" purposes and then removed as quickly as possible before feeling and engaging the object of your affection who was wrapped in silky layers of nylon tricot. For the male (and his member), he was basically out of luck. There were some early attempts at manufacturing men's nylon tricot underwear, but to differentiate it from the smoother, silkier women's style, it was a slightly courser, ribbed material. If by age 5 I had figured out that nylon tricot panties felt better than by JCP boy's briefs, I suspect more than a few husbands had discovered this as well. More than one load, I'm sure, was pumped into a pair of his wife's silky nylon tricot panties without her knowing about it.

So this is what it's all about. Ejaculation. Male orgasm. Shooting your load. Getting off. Who doesn't like to see a fountain like this? Then it's over. Then it gets cold and sticky and gets wiped up and flushed or thrown away. Time for sex to be over and get cleaned up--along with whatever lube that may have been used to induce the ejaculation. One of my favorite advantages of ejaculating into nylon is that it completely eliminates all the "after" needs. You blow your load by yourself into whatever sliding nylon you have been using or wearing and that is it. Fall asleep. Happy nylon tricot dreams..... Ejaculating with someone else (together or separately) presents more possibilities. Depending on what method you used to ejaculate while you were wearing it (shorts, panties, Speedos, Mormon garment, etc.) swapping the item where you shot your load with your partner and you each wearing each other's spermed soaked item is amazing. Whether you spend the night together and then shoot another load in the morning or leave afterwards wearing a souvenir or trophy of nylon sex together, I guarantee you will be shooting your own load onto his shortly after--or maybe just keep that crunchy tricot as a memento. My friend who describes nylon tricot as a "dry lube" has a good way of putting it.

Amazing as it is to me, there will always be those clueless guys who still feel the need to wear cotton underwear (particularly if they are waistband name trendies) under even silky, shiny shorts. Even though most of them were made of a silky polyester, they were mostly compatible and worked the same as nylon in getting you off. I say "were" since in case you haven't gone shopping lately, they have all but disappeared from the market.

This guy is working so hard to get this guy off in his cotton. I hope the guy is uncut since he might actually have a chance to get off and, if not, destroyed the sensitivity of his manhood forever. If those were 2 (or more) layers of sliding nylon tricot, those briefs would be soaked by now.

Of course manufacturers were aware of the whole male cliché of "like father like son" and that included their underwear. This is just one of virtually every underwear maker's ad to market to the male market. Truthfully, none of these "innovations" or different shaped fly opening or size of it or position of it really made up for the fact that they were all made out of cotton. They got sweaty and stayed sweaty. They also had to be removed for sex and certainly could not have been used for having sex in or with. All that talk about support and pouches and protection were basically meaningless. A couple of silky nylon tricot panties would have accomplished all of the same purposes but added the addition of comfort, silkiness and ultimately sexuality for the man or boy from this time.

Historically speaking, this would have been one of the big taboos of a man wearing nylon panties. But if it was his wife who got him off in them, well, that was their little secret. One of the biggest myths that exist out there is that men who wear nylon panties are either gay or want to be women. As I have said many times, most gay men WANT other men. The last thing most gay men would be caught dead in would be nylon panties. When I look through a men in panties site, they are mostly straight men and they are wearing everything from cotton to lace or lycra materials. It has nothing to do with the material, it's the feminine connection that is the attraction. The sex aspects are all connected and tied to having sex with another woman as a man dressed as a woman. These same men might be some of the most homophobic people you could meet. They like the idea of dressing as a woman, being dominated by a woman, even being fucked by a woman with a strap on and treated like a whore, but it does not involve anything to do with a man. Therefore it does not have any interest to me, but I mention it here more as yet another variation that makes up human sexuality that concerns nylon tricot.

In a far more modern, practical, and almost comical look at men's and women's underwear today, being completely devoid of any silky, nylon tricot material, who cares who wears what? I have absolutely no attraction to anything they are wearing or holding. However, there are sites on the internet that literally feature thousands of men wearing variations of these stretchy, creepy things and they are all turned on because of the feminine connection.

One of the few gay men out there who "gets it" in my world is JW. An all male Texan, he has no problem wearing a pair or 2 of silky nylon tricot panties under his work clothes each day. He knows how to jerk of in them and has had some success in talking other guys into trying them.

I'm quire sure he does not want to be a woman or wear dresses or make-up, but if he did, that's his business and not mine. He enjoys and likes wearing nylon tricot underwear, having sex in them and that's what this blog is all about.

I found this photo of a vintage Munsingwear men's brief. The person who posted it probably didn't even know these are made out of nylon tricot (in particular, Munsingwear's own brand of nylon they called "trico-lon" that is incredibly silky. The brief mirrors all of the attributes of their cotton brief. The wide waistband, the horizontal pouch, the seams, and all the inhibitions and obstructions in design. If the upper center panel had at least been double sliding nylon tricot, that would have helped. If a man really wanted to wear nylon underwear and especially if it would be seen by other men at the club or gym, then this was for him.

Periodically someone comes out with some sort of "compromise" underwear that acknowledge the feminine connection with materials and color and then find some well build models to wear them and attempt to give them some sort of desirability if not sensuality. Boring. Wrong. They're not feminine enough for guys who want them to be and not masculine enough for most straight guys to wear. However, they got one thing right: THE SILKY!

These formerly issued military PT shorts have returned in greater popularity than they ever had as a required uniform for working out. I have published enough passionate declarations from straight military users. Yes, some of it tongue in cheek, but more than a level of true sensual enjoyment of wearing these 100% nylon tricot shorts with a built in panty. Even calling the black versions Ranger Panties.

Not sure if these are the original Soffee brand of Ranger Panties or some other version. If someone would only make them with the inner liner / panty reverses, the outer short would slide on the inner and they would be difficult to wear without a semi at all times.

Unfortunately this is as large as I could make this little group of nylon tricot wearing marines appear. The guy bending over on the left is showing what wearing these silkies is all about with his extremely visible panty line and undoubtedly his equally visible penis line o the other side. The boots, the socks and then nothing else but silky nylon on those bodies is about as hot as it gets. The resurgence of them (even though now banned for their original use as PT shorts) is one of the few triumphs of nylon tricot in the 21st Century.

If you're still a little shy about using the term "panty" when referring to anything that a man would wear, get over it. This USMC is very proud of not only showing his manhood, but what's supporting it.

There's another photo of this guy wearing some of his other colors of silkies. There are some guys who really do like the way these feel and anything else they might like or use them for in private, I guess you'll just have to find out.

Speaking of falling in love and wearing nylon, can't end this posting without mentioning the thousands of lifeguards who still enjoy wearing their nylon suits which also contain an inner liner / panty as well.

There is nothing that feels better than stroking your manhood parts through some silky nylon tricot--except maybe another layer or 2 sliding as well especially if your eventual intent is to shoot your load into them. No seams to get in the way, no wide elastic to prevent entry or exit, and plenty of unrestricted play room for your pleasure.

Imagine a church that makes you spent 2 years living with other guys under 20 with the option of wearing nylon tricot underwear 24/7? Well, that's not all entirely true or that it ever works out the way we would like it to happen, but they sure make some incredible nylon tricot underwear. In particular, their one piece (onesie) are some of the finest nylon sex attire.

For some annoying reason, in the 2 piece nylon garments, they have inserted a cotton panel to prevent the 2 overlapping pieces of fabric from sliding. However, they make up for it with the one piece and allow an oversized, erection holding, double layers that can take care of any morning wood--or any other wood any other time of day.

About the closest thing out there today comes from the last good maker of men's nylon tricot underwear. Unfortunately what they make is more for show since it's microfiber or lycra and not nylon tricot.

Very annoying that American Apparel actually advertises these (and others) as "Nylon Tricot" and they will show up in searches as being so. However, once you actually go to the item and read the fine print, they do mention they are actually lycra. These are, therefore, NOT nylon tricot. You could probably still get this guy off in these if you were to slide some actual nylon tricot something over these.

So who do you think is having the better time? The poor cotton guy really looks like he is suffering. Meanwhile, the 2 guys above frotting in their silky nylon tricot are probably on their 3rd load and still going strong.